<html><body><div class="_stretch"><span class="body-text-content">Good evening Michael,<br><br><br><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> The advantage is that we have data available for the entire Netherlands until the milestones are mapped at their final location.</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> That looks like an advantage but it is a big disadvantage. It is never a <span style="line-height: 1.5;">good idea to import data into OSM and let the community fix it.</span></blockquote><br>personally, I regard this differently; why would we only accept a final form of data, while we are currently not having any Dutch milestone data at all? To illustrate this: OSM is actually based on importing data which was afterwards improved. As an example: in the Netherlands all meadows and residential areas for example have been imported by AND. These were welcomed as a country-wide basis because there wasn't any data on this subject at all by then. Nowadays, we are still improving and detailling that data through Bing and other sources.<br>Imagine the other method: not accepting any meadow imports for example and ask all mappers to map meadows according to Bing. That would take years, while still having blank spots. A nice example of such a contradiction can be found at the border of the Netherlands with Nordrhein-Westfalen: <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/52.2635/7.1727">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/52.2635/7.1727</a>. <br><br><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> Just have a look at all these TIGER data garbage (stevea as railway mapper could teach you a lesson – he is fixing all these data in California). <span style="line-height: 1.5;">The TIGER import imported road data of a low quality over the whole US. </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Up to now about 95 % (rough estimation) has not been fixed. The import </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">took place about 6 to 8 years ago! There are several other imports which </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">did the same – their data has not been fixed yet.</span></blockquote><span> </span><br>A nice example of a big bad import indeed. I think it is not justified to compare such a poor and large import with my current proposal though:</span></div><div class="_stretch"><ol><li>A few weeks ago, I attended a guest lecture on mapping ProRail's infrastructure. Fugro explained how they did it with a standard deviation of 15 mm's. That very data is the source for my import proposal, which makes my import data somewhat 500 times more precise than the TIGER import data. When comparing with the current OSM data, this means a deviation of max. 2 metres with the current OSM data, which I consider as very acceptable. If you wish, please consider the attached lecture nodes at page 21 and the attached JOSM screenshots (blue dots are ProRail data and grey is OSM rail).</li><li>TIGER consists of many seperate changesets. When I first attempted the milestone import, it was possible with just one single changeset. This makes it very easy to revert if ever considered necessary.</li><li>Another safety measure is the tag combination that I'll add to it, which makes it easy to remove parts of the dataset by using XAPI. This enables mappers that are adding more precise data, to remove old data parallel to theirs with some simple mouseclicks.</li><li>TIGER consists of a heterogeneous network of ways with even some weird drawing styles for seperated lanes. My proposal is very simple and contains just nodes with homogeneous properties (all nodes the same tags).</li><li>Like described above, the import will not intervene in existing data, because there is literally just two milestones in the entire country (like shown in the attached overpass).</li></ol><span class="body-text-content"><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> Shortly, if you propose an import at Imports list as you are doing here <span style="line-height: 1.5;">now, your proposal will definitely fail.</span></blockquote><span><div class="_stretch"><span class="body-text-content"><span><br></span></span></div>Since I already tried this before, I am well aware of the standards of the Imports mailing list. Thank you for your concerns though; it's members are (with reason) very strict.</span></span></div><div class="_stretch"><br><span class="body-text-content"><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> 2015-04-14 01:47 JJJ Wegdam wrote:</blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> Milestone systems and signal locations are used for many purposes, <span style="line-height: 1.5;">like defining and finding maintenance or research locations, but also </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">capacity-calculation. Especially the milestones; I simply know that </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">ProRail employees would greatly appreciate a milestone map that works </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">well at their mobile phone. Railmaps does not and ORM does. I </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">promised them to make this work as soon as I could. This is also why </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">I tried the milestone import before.</span></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> <br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text"> If people are interested in having milestons in OSM why don't you ask <span style="line-height: 1.5;">them to help them tracing from an WMS layer.</span></blockquote><span> </span></span></div><div class="_stretch">Because all interested people that I am aware of are working in the rail sector. Because of competition between the companies, they are all interested in either improving their own services or welcoming open source services made by others.</div><div class="_stretch"><br><span class="body-text-content"><blockquote type="cite" class="quoted-plain-text">You can set up a WMS <span style="line-height: 1.5;">service using a database like PostGIS + a server like Mapserver or </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Geoserver. I will try to set up such a service (it's not much data, i.e. </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">it does not need a powerful server) at my private server but you might </span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">have to wait a few days.</span></blockquote><span> <br>I'm unaware of what WMS precisely is and how it works, but it sounds nice. I could provide you with the shapefiles and accompanying QGIS renders?<br><br><br>Kind regards,</span></span></div><div class="_stretch"><span class="body-text-content"><span>Jeroen<br><br><br><br><img class="_mime-inline " style="margin:10px;" title="Milestone precision 1.PNG" src="cid:97d48db0-f3d5-4277-a412-9679d4fd66b6@icloud.com" alt="Milestone precision 1.PNG" data-mce-src="blob:https%3A//www.icloud.com/d8733586-24db-434c-93d0-5f705a35b406" data-mce-style="margin: 10px;"><img class="_mime-inline " style="margin:10px;" title="Milestone precision 2.PNG" src="cid:5955e3f4-2667-46d8-bd2e-dc4eceb087f9@icloud.com" alt="Milestone precision 2.PNG" data-mce-src="blob:https%3A//www.icloud.com/febb4266-29e1-4493-a764-7a79891e265d" data-mce-style="margin: 10px;"><img class="_mime-inline " style="margin:10px;" title="milestone overpass.PNG" src="cid:5dd0022c-a2f3-4a93-afd1-f945ba010d9d@icloud.com" alt="milestone overpass.PNG" data-mce-src="blob:https%3A//www.icloud.com/ae12eb1b-1f7e-454d-b4f6-8f9e4c77d8ad" data-mce-style="margin: 10px;"><br></span></span></div></body></html>