This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.
Am Samstag, 11. April 2015, 09:05:41 schrieb danmey at web.de: > Am 02.04.2015 um 04:50 schrieb Roland Hieber: > > I vote in favour for this idea to avoid a German viewpoint, and would like > > to rename railway:station_category to railway:station_category:de for > > this case. railway:station_category and railway:station_importance can > > thus be used in parallel. For railway:station_importance, I propose > > something like the following > > explanations (but I can only give examples for Germany, sorry): > I think, we should retag, too. > The problem now is, that the values combine with Deutsche Bahn category > system; but perhaps any other railway company has only categories from 1 > to 6 or whatever. > Perhaphs something like category_range=1-7 would help (to set the > margins). If not, I would favour "railway:station_category:*de*". It is > a tag majorly in use in Germany, so the retagging discussion would not > be too big. The problem is not the key, the problem is the value. Having a tag that will be used only in one country is IMHO nonsense. Just stick with railway:station_category and change the values to de:1 or even de-DB:1. That's what we do for signals anyway. Eike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20150411/e042c8e5/attachment.sig>