This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.
Hi, Am 2015-04-02 um 04:50 schrieb Roland Hieber: > On 29.03.2015 22:11, Alexander Matheisen wrote: >> Or should we create a new tag a tag like railway:station_importance=* >> with some category values such as local/regional/international/... and >> leave the existing railway:station_category=* tag for mapping >> country-specific categories? > > I vote in favour for this idea to avoid a German viewpoint, and would like to > rename railway:station_category to railway:station_category:de for this case. > railway:station_category and railway:station_importance can thus be used in > parallel. For railway:station_importance, I propose something like the following > explanations (but I can only give examples for Germany, sorry): I would avoid retagging railway:station_category as railway:station_category:de because there is no need to retag all stations and halts and because there is no conflict to other tags. > *railway:station_importance=local*: The station has importance for a few > surrounding villages and/or towns. Some regional trains may not even stop here. > (In Germany, this would typically correspond to Bahnhofskategorie 7-5, examples: > rural stops, suburbs, S-Bahn stations) > > *railway:station_importance=regional*: A stop with higher importance, for > example a connecting station on a railway junction. At least all regional trains > stop here, maybe even some interregional trains. (typically Bahnhofskategorie > 5-3, for example Kreiensen , Rothenburg , or Großheringen ) > > : http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.8531/9.9615 > : http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/53.1073/9.3988 > : http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.1059/11.6603 > > *railway:station_importance=interregional*: The station serves more than only > regional trains, it is commonly used to change for interregional and intercity > connections. The station is usually the most important one of several railway > stops in a city. (Bahnhofskategorie 3-2, for example Göttingen , Ulm Hbf ) > > : http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/51.5408/9.9134 > : http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/48.4046/9.9726 > > *railway:station_importance=international*: The station is a big hub in the > national railway system and serves long-distance connections to major national > or even international cities. It usually also provides access to an > international airport. (Bahnhofskategorie 2-1, examples: Frankfurt Hbf, > Frankfurt Flughafen, Berlin Hbf, München Hbf, Hannover Hbf) I agree this system but I suggest to introduce two additional levels. Not only train stations are tagged with railway=station. This tag is also used for subway stations (often together with station=subway). Almost a year ago I have been asked by Mentz DV if there is a differentiation between minor and major tram stops. There is no one at the moment (you have to count the route relations whose member the stations is). That's why I suggest to extend this tag to every station/halt where a railway-like vehicle stops. *railway:station_importance=minor_urban*: The station is not served by trains (i.e. only by subways, light rails and/or trams). Stations of this importance are only few hundreds of metres apart from each other. There is no change to other subway/light_rail/tram lines possible there. Change to bus lines may be possible there. Examples: Plieninger Straße in Stuttgart , August-Bebel-Straße in Kalrsruhe   http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.72436/9.15693&layers=T  http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.02436/8.37735&layers=T *railway:station_importance=major_urban*: The station has importance for a subway, light rail or tram transport system. The station is only few hundreds of metres apart from the next station of this category or the category minor_urban. There is change to other subway/light_rail/tram lines and (optional) to buses and trains possible there. Examples: Möhringen Bahnhof in Stuttgart , Neumarkt in Cologne   http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.73078/9.14852&layers=T  http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.93609/6.94824&layers=T *Other Examples* Stuttgart Nord, aka Stuttgart Nordbahnhof would be "regional" because the S-Bahn to Weil der Stadt, Bietigheim-Bissingen and Backnang stops there. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.80352/9.19036&layers=T Berlin Warschauer Straße would also be "regional" because Berlin S-Bahn runs far out of Berlin (e.g. Strausberg Nord). http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.50642/13.45119&layers=T Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20150402/cf1ffa66/attachment.sig>