This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.

[openrailwaymap] Station importance

Rolf Eike Beer eike at
Sat Apr 11 09:29:25 MEST 2015

> But as far as I understand the question, the problem is a render problem
> in cases of  collision. This happens with a small number of stations per
> case. So, we don't need absolute importance of stations here, but a
> relative ranking of these few stations.
> And I suppose, in most of these cases, a non-perfect method like the 2 I
> proposed, could work.

The problem is that the renderer would need to do a lot of calculations for 
this, which usually is something you want to avoid as that process takes a lot 
of time anyway. Walking relations up and down is IMHO one of the last things 
you want to do there if you can avoid it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the Openrailwaymap mailing list