This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.
> But as far as I understand the question, the problem is a render problem > in cases of collision. This happens with a small number of stations per > case. So, we don't need absolute importance of stations here, but a > relative ranking of these few stations. > And I suppose, in most of these cases, a non-perfect method like the 2 I > proposed, could work. The problem is that the renderer would need to do a lot of calculations for this, which usually is something you want to avoid as that process takes a lot of time anyway. Walking relations up and down is IMHO one of the last things you want to do there if you can avoid it. Eike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20150411/80c16947/attachment.sig>