This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.

[openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?

Rolf Eike Beer eike at sf-mail.de
Sun Sep 25 21:41:45 MEST 2016


Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2016, 19:47:00 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2016, 14:53:02 schrieb Michael Reichert:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am 2016-08-29 um 21:46 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> > > I wonder if we should retire the "deelectrified" tag entirely. I think
> > > it's
> > > simply a bad idea. There is the abandoned-namespace that we already use
> > > for
> > > the type of rail and similar things, so why not use
> > > abandoned:electrified=*? This has the advantage that we can also use
> > > e.g.
> > > abandoned:voltage and abandoned:frequency.

I have changed the wiki for German and English. Please update the other 
languages if you are able to do that, I am not.

And, of course: if you added tags with deelectrified, then please update them 
in the OSM database.

Eike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20160925/6bb1da36/attachment.sig>


More information about the Openrailwaymap mailing list