This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.

[openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?

Rolf Eike Beer eike at sf-mail.de
Mon Sep 26 12:41:03 MEST 2016


Am 2016-09-26 12:24, schrieb Mauro Costantini:
> Thank you so much.
> Btw, in the same manner, should we move from "railway=abandoned" (wich
> told nothing about the type of the railway) to the newer tagging
> scheme "abandoned:railway=*" in order to be consistent with the
> namespaces life cycle perefixes (and mantain the information about the
> railway's type) ?

That is already what we do, in some way.

Active: railway=rail;*=*
<here comes the bulldozer>
Removed: railway=abandoned;abandoned:railway=rail;abandoned:*=*

Eike



More information about the Openrailwaymap mailing list