This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.

[openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?

Rolf Eike Beer eike at sf-mail.de
Mon Aug 29 21:46:48 MEST 2016


I wonder if we should retire the "deelectrified" tag entirely. I think it's 
simply a bad idea. There is the abandoned-namespace that we already use for 
the type of rail and similar things, so why not use abandoned:electrified=*? 
This has the advantage that we can also use e.g. abandoned:voltage and 
abandoned:frequency. Taginfo shows that deelectrified has slightly more usages 
than abandoned:electrified: 514 vs. 466. Changing this now isn't that hard I 
guess…

Greetings,

Eike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20160829/df3e0789/attachment.sig>


More information about the Openrailwaymap mailing list