This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.
Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 11:55:39 schrieb JJJ Wegdam: > Good afternoon Eike, > > > Op 7 mei 2015 om 08:14 heeft Rolf Eike Beer <eike at sf-mail.de> het volgende > > geschreven:> > > Am Samstag, 2. Mai 2015, 22:28:43 schrieb JJJ Wegdam: > >> Dear contributors, > >> > >> while the WMS of the milestones (slice 1) ought to be being developed, I > >> decided to introduce you guys to slice 2. The proposal that I'm about to > >> present is about the Dutch equivalent of Betriebsstelle: > >> dienstregelingspunten. Freely translated, this means timetable-nodes. The > >> English equivalent is the collection of yards, junctions, sidings and > >> moveable bridges (note that yards and sidings are distinguished in the > >> Dutch definition). > > > > So, what exactly will that look like? One point per "station", that would > > match what we have as railway=station (or halt, or service_station)? For > > those elements the node is placed "in the center of the object", so I > > guess any coordinate you would give us would be fine. > > You can consider the data as a collection of names for points of interest > along the railway, which the operator uses to construct a smooth timetable. > For more info on the subject, you could consult > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Operating_Sites, > where the tagging of these nodes is described. I already tested two > locations: > > • http://puu.sh/hExsV/47862d83d4.jpg shows an example of a cargo yard near > Rotterdam. • http://puu.sh/hExu2/8f324e6bc0.jpg is a junction near > Amersfoort. > > My main question is: assuming that everything will be done in accordance > with the import guidelines and ORM tagging scheme, would you agree on an > automated import of these nodes? I'm probably no authority, but for me this sounds as it is in accordance with our tagging scheme. I would suggest you show a small piece of (OSM) data on the import wiki page to make it easier to see if your new nodes are "sound". Eike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20150510/5c657997/attachment.sig>