This mailing list has been migrated to Mailman 3. This archive will no longer be updated. Messages after 1 February 2020 are missing. Please use the new archive instead.
Diese Mailingliste wurde auf Mailman 3 umgestellt. Dieses Archiv wird nicht mehr länger aktualisiert. Nachrichten nach dem 1. Februar 2020 fehlen. Bitte benutze das neue Archiv.
Am Montag, den 10.10.2016, 22:34 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein: > Ok, I see. And how should I tag disused/abandoned turntables > correctly? > > [1] uses: > > > > > disused turntable > > railway disused this is wrong for the same reason as described in an earlier post: railway=disused should be used for tracks, not disused railway features in general. > [2, 3] uses (latter one for abandoned): > > > > > disused yes > > railway turntable This is not wrong, but not the best solution. This disused=yes stuff was established tagging before the lifecycle tagging appeared. But today this tagging is deprecated and should be retagged using the lifecycle schema in my opinion. But this schema is still in use. > Considering the life cycle, the "best" tagging might be: > > > > > disused:railway=turntable [abandoned:railway=turntable] > Right? Correct. Regards Alex -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/attachments/20161012/f039c103/attachment.sig>