[openrailwaymap] Re: Tagging decision: ebicab, atc, convel, zub123
Looks great Eike! Thanks for helping us forward.
Best regards,
JJJWegdam
> Op 10 apr. 2021 om 18:35 heeft Rolf Eike Beer <eike(a)sf-mail.de> het volgende
geschreven:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 16:51:21 CEST schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
>> Am Sonntag, 7. Februar 2021, 12:40:43 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
>>>> 1. Render compatible systems
>>>>
>>>> consequences:
>>>> a) we proceed with this PR as is
>>>> b) we have to retag Portugal, Sweden, Norway and Finland (I'm willing
to
>>>> help)
>>>> c) we should create an additional PR to also render `railway:zub=123`
>>>> d) Denmark should be tagged with `railway:zub=123`
>>>
>>> If we are going to retag things, I still think that defining a
>>> railway:train_protection=* system is much less work. Think about your PRs:
>>> how many railway:foobar=no tags do you want to get a "proper"
selector for
>>> "no system".
>>
>> I will do a tagging proposal in the wiki in the next days, which should help
>> documenting that if we agree on that.
>
> Here we go:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/railway:train_prote...
>
> Please use the discussion page for proposed changes, and only directly edit
> the main page for obvious things like layout errors and typos.
>
> Eike