Hello,
Am Freitag, den 04.03.2016, 00:15 +0100 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
I don't think that the proposal in this way works. I would have
something in
mind that is something like the "dominance" of mountains: how
important that
station is compared to the surrounding area.
> * importance=international:
> * Location and served areas: located in big cities (often
> capitals),
> an important node in the international and national long-distance
> traffic network, is a central node of the public transport network
> of
> large region
> * Traffic: highspeed trains, long-distance trains, night trains,
> regional trains, commuter trains
> * Examples: Frankfurt (Main), Munich, Stuttgart, Vienna, Salzburg
"My" biggest station is Hannover Hauptbahnhof, which according to
Wikipedia is
the 6st biggest station according to passenger movements in Germany.
But it
wouldn't really fit here because there are very few international
connections
because Hannover is so central in Germany. On the other hand you have
many
international traffic if you are close to the border (e.g.
Saarbrücken), which
has only ~10% of the passenger movements of Hannover. I don't know if
you have
any international connections running from any station in New York
because the
USA are itself that big. You will not find any international traffic
in entire
Japan. There is little highspeed traffic in the USA, at least when
measured with
European scales.
So even if international traffic is only one aspect the name is IMHO
a bad idea.
A station in the highest category would IMHO:
-be served from the trains of all categories available in that
country
(required)
-allow interchange between highest category trains traveling to
different
directions,
-or is the end point of multiple of those lines
-is used by several million people per year, the number needs to be
discussed
to account e.g. for extremely dense populated areas like China
-is the most important station of a greater are, depending on how
densely
populated that are is, e.g. Cologne and Düsseldorf are quite close,
but both
important, Hannover of similar passenger count is the biggest station
in at
least 100km radius
Just from a German view, both Hamburg Hauptbahnhof and Altona are
"category
1", but Altona is big only for reasons of train movements. Berlin has
4 cat 1
stations, but the outer 3 are discussable of being important enough
to deserve
a place in the most important category.
I added my draft to the OSM wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rurseekatze/Station_Importance_Draft.
In this version of the draft, I removed all that international stuff, as this is
problematic like you described here. Instead I used terms that refer more to geographic
distances and the train network than to boundaries.
Regards
Alex