[openrailwaymap] Re: Train protection system naming inconsitencies
tomasmarklund75＠gmail.com wrote:
Well, 'ATC' isn't ambigous in Sweden. In Sweden, there is
only one ATC, and it
will never be mixed up with japanese or bulgarian ATC.
Does that mean we should also tag Danish, Bulgarian, or Japanese ATC as
"Railway:atc=yes"?
And the system IS called ATC, signs along the track say "ATC
begins" or
"ATC ends" or similar, documentation for drivers etc say ATC, documentation on
the Trafikverket website says ATC. ATC everywhere, never Ebicab. So it would be fairly
confusing to tag the railways with something "no one"* has heard of. Because
of
this, I do NOT vote for changing tags in sweden from ATC to Ebicab. If something has to
be
changed, then ATC-SE is a better choise.
So why should Danish ATC be tagged ZUB123? All signs say ATC, all driver documentation say
ATC, (almost) no-one has heard about ZUB123. Yet that is still the tag used for Denmark.