tomasmarklund75＠gmail.com wrote:
Well, 'ATC' isn't ambigous in Sweden. In Sweden, there is only one ATC, and it will never be mixed up with japanese or bulgarian ATC.
Does that mean we should also tag Danish, Bulgarian, or Japanese ATC as "Railway:atc=yes"?
And the system IS called ATC, signs along the track say "ATC begins" or "ATC ends" or similar, documentation for drivers etc say ATC, documentation on the Trafikverket website says ATC. ATC everywhere, never Ebicab. So it would be fairly confusing to tag the railways with something "no one"* has heard of. Because of this, I do NOT vote for changing tags in sweden from ATC to Ebicab. If something has to be changed, then ATC-SE is a better choise.
So why should Danish ATC be tagged ZUB123? All signs say ATC, all driver documentation say ATC, (almost) no-one has heard about ZUB123. Yet that is still the tag used for Denmark.