Good evening Michael,
while studying for my exams I came across your question and I'm happy to answer this
one. I attached a link to an image from my railway engineering book, which confirms that
it is an expansion device.
After my exams are finished I'll be more active on ORM again. Good luck!
Kind regards,
Jeroen
Op 22 jun. 2015 om 23:23 heeft Michael Reichert
<nakaner(a)gmx.net> het volgende geschreven:
Hi Martin,
> Am 2015-06-22 um 21:53 schrieb Martin Simon:
>
> I would like to add some detail on railway and tram lines in my area and
> have been searching for a tag for "rail movement joints" / "railway
> expansion devices" (I found these terms online, the German term is
> "Auszugvorrichtung").
Is this a rail movement joint?
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vbvbEe2wwtF_4MlMw6cakw (zoom in)
Btw, driving above it is horrible because it is no smooth curve.
> How should we tag these features in OSM?
>
> railway=movement_joint?
>
> railway=expension_device?
Have you had a look into English books, professional railway magazines
etc.? Which word do they use? I can have a look into UIC dictionary at
university tomorrow (I just have to walk to another building of my
university).
> Which object type should be used? From a map perspective, they might be
> "point" features, marking the point where the tracks are cut. If you're
a
> railway planner, however, you need to consider that the device itself has a
> length of several meters - not as big as the average switch/turnout, but
> still...
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vbvbEe2wwtF_4MlMw6cakw
is short, I would map it as a node. We also map switches with speed
limits of 200 km/h as nodes!
Best regards
Michael
--
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
_______________________________________________
Openrailwaymap mailing list
Openrailwaymap(a)openrailwaymap.org
http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap