Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?

Hi, Am 2016-08-29 um 21:46 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > I wonder if we should retire the "deelectrified" tag entirely. I think > it's > simply a bad idea. There is the abandoned-namespace that we already use > for > the type of rail and similar things, so why not use > abandoned:electrified=*? This has the advantage that we can also use e.g. > abandoned:voltage and abandoned:frequency. deelectrified=* was added to the wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging) by YamaOfParadise about two years ago. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=OpenRailwayMap%2FTagging... pe=revision&diff=1070191&oldid=1069876 YamaOfParadies, could you explain why you chose this tag? Or did you just add it to document its usage? I myself think that using the lifecycle prefix scheme is a good idea.