Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?
Am 2016-09-26 12:24, schrieb Mauro Costantini:
Thank you so much.
Btw, in the same manner, should we move from "railway=abandoned" (wich
told nothing about the type of the railway) to the newer tagging
scheme "abandoned:railway=*" in order to be consistent with the
namespaces life cycle perefixes (and mantain the information about the
railway's type) ?
That is already what we do, in some way.
Active: railway=rail;*=*
<here comes the bulldozer>
Removed: railway=abandoned;abandoned:railway=rail;abandoned:*=*
Eike