Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?
Am Montag, den 10.10.2016, 22:34 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
Ok, I see. And how should I tag disused/abandoned turntables
correctly?
[1] uses:
>
> disused turntable
> railway disused
this is wrong for the same reason as described in an earlier post:
railway=disused should be used for tracks, not disused railway features
in general.
[2, 3] uses (latter one for abandoned):
>
> disused yes
> railway turntable
This is not wrong, but not the best solution. This disused=yes stuff
was established tagging before the lifecycle tagging appeared. But
today this tagging is deprecated and should be retagged using the
lifecycle schema in my opinion. But this schema is still in use.
Considering the life cycle, the "best" tagging might be:
>
> disused:railway=turntable [abandoned:railway=turntable]
Right?
Correct.
Regards
Alex
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 473 bytes)