Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?
Hi,
Am 2016-08-29 um 21:46 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
I wonder if we should retire the "deelectrified" tag
entirely. I think it's
simply a bad idea. There is the abandoned-namespace that we already use for
the type of rail and similar things, so why not use abandoned:electrified=*?
This has the advantage that we can also use e.g. abandoned:voltage and
abandoned:frequency.
deelectrified=* was added to the wiki page
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging) by
YamaOfParadise about two years ago.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=OpenRailwayMap%2FTagging...
YamaOfParadies, could you explain why you chose this tag? Or did you
just add it to document its usage?
I myself think that using the lifecycle prefix scheme is a good idea.
Best regards
Michael
--
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 801 bytes)