Am Freitag, den 07.10.2016, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
Similar topic, same issue: Can/Shall the lifecycle tagging scheme also be used for nodes?
E.g., near Hamburg Hbf. a node [1] is currently tagged as follows:
railway:disused=switch railway:local_operated=no railway:switch=default
I would prefer two additional tags:
disused:railway=switch railway:disused=switch railway:local_operated=no railway:switch=default railway=disused
However, JOSM complains on the usage of "railway=disused" on nodes.
If you want to use lifecycle tagging, then the disused has to be before the key itself, e.g. disused:railway=switch, not railway:disused=switch.
So your example should be:
* disused:railway=switch * disused:railway:local_operated=no * disused:railway:switch=default
railway=disused for nodes is just wrong because the meaning of railway=disused is "a disused railway track", not "any type of disused railway feature".
Regards Alex