Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a good idea?
Am Freitag, den 07.10.2016, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
Similar topic, same issue: Can/Shall the lifecycle tagging scheme
also
be used for nodes?
E.g., near Hamburg Hbf. a node [1] is currently tagged as follows:
>
> railway:disused=switch
> railway:local_operated=no
> railway:switch=default
I would prefer two additional tags:
>
> disused:railway=switch
> railway:disused=switch
> railway:local_operated=no
> railway:switch=default
> railway=disused
However, JOSM complains on the usage of "railway=disused" on nodes.
If you want to use lifecycle tagging, then the disused has to be before
the key itself, e.g. disused:railway=switch, not
railway:disused=switch.
So your example should be:
* disused:railway=switch
* disused:railway:local_operated=no
* disused:railway:switch=default
railway=disused for nodes is just wrong because the meaning of
railway=disused is "a disused railway track", not "any type of disused
railway feature".
Regards
Alex
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 473 bytes)