Dear all,
Am 08.10.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Am Freitag, den 07.10.2016, 13:07 +0200 schrieb Denis Stein:
Similar topic, same issue: Can/Shall the lifecycle tagging scheme also be used for nodes?
E.g., near Hamburg Hbf. a node [1] is currently tagged as follows:
railway:disused=switch railway:local_operated=no railway:switch=default
If you want to use lifecycle tagging, then the disused has to be before the key itself, e.g. disused:railway=switch, not railway:disused=switch.
So your example should be:
- disused:railway=switch
- disused:railway:local_operated=no
- disused:railway:switch=default
railway=disused for nodes is just wrong because the meaning of railway=disused is "a disused railway track", not "any type of disused railway feature".
Ok, I see. And how should I tag disused/abandoned turntables correctly?
[1] uses:
disused turntable railway disused
[2, 3] uses (latter one for abandoned):
disused yes railway turntable
Considering the life cycle, the "best" tagging might be:
disused:railway=turntable [abandoned:railway=turntable]
Right?
Kind regards,
Denis.
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172383072
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314900683
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217164488