Am Samstag, 11. April 2015, 09:05:41 schrieb danmey(a)web.de:
Am 02.04.2015 um 04:50 schrieb Roland Hieber:
> I vote in favour for this idea to avoid a German viewpoint, and would like
> to rename railway:station_category to railway:station_category:de for
> this case. railway:station_category and railway:station_importance can
> thus be used in parallel. For railway:station_importance, I propose
> something like the following
> explanations (but I can only give examples for Germany, sorry):
I think, we should retag, too.
The problem now is, that the values combine with Deutsche Bahn category
system; but perhaps any other railway company has only categories from 1
to 6 or whatever.
Perhaphs something like category_range=1-7 would help (to set the
margins). If not, I would favour "railway:station_category:*de*". It is
a tag majorly in use in Germany, so the retagging discussion would not
be too big.
The problem is not the key, the problem is the value. Having a tag that will
be used only in one country is IMHO nonsense. Just stick with
railway:station_category and change the values to de:1 or even de-DB:1. That's
what we do for signals anyway.