1:48 p.m.
Hi all,
I am wondering why the railway track 6949 is not shown in ORM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7905077#map=14/54.1293/12.2472&...
Any ideas?
2:12 p.m.
On 2020-05-20 13:48, Eckhard M wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering why the railway track 6949 is not shown in ORM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7905077#map=14/54.1293/12.2472&...
What Rolf said earlier:
-lines with both usage as well as service are not shown: this is a
tagging
mistake and we force users to correct there things with that
I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have tags
service=spur and usage=branch.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008
Maarten
2:47 p.m.
Hi Maarten,
thanks for the hint. I mentioned the relation only to show you all related
ways. I just revised the affected ways.
Why does the renderer not prefer on of the tags? I think its better to have
a wrong track type in ORM than no track.
Thanks and best regards
Eckhard
Am Mi., 20. Mai 2020 um 14:12 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen <mdeen(a)xs4all.nl>:
On 2020-05-20 13:48, Eckhard M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering why the railway track 6949 is not shown in ORM:
>
>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7905077#map=14/54.1293/12.2472&...
What Rolf said earlier:
> -lines with both usage as well as service are not shown: this is a
> tagging
> mistake and we force users to correct there things with that
I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have tags
service=spur and usage=branch.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008
Maarten
9:38 p.m.
Hi,
Am 20/05/2020 um 14.12 schrieb Maarten Deen:
I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have
tags
service=spur and usage=branch.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008
Route relations are not rendered.
Best regards
Michael
1:36 p.m.
Hi Michael,
that relations will not be rendered is absolutely clear. I only quotes that
to collect all the ways that are missing.
But again: Why does the renderer not prefer on of the tags if service and
usage are used for the same way? I think its better to have a wrong track
type in ORM than no track.
Regards,
Eckhard
Am Do., 21. Mai 2020 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb Michael Reichert <
osm-ml(a)michreichert.de>:
Hi,
Am 20/05/2020 um 14.12 schrieb Maarten Deen:
> I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have tags
> service=spur and usage=branch.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008
Route relations are not rendered.
Best regards
Michael
1790
days inactive
1793
days old
openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Eckhard M
-
Maarten Deen
-
Michael Reichert