Hi Maarten,

thanks for the hint. I mentioned the relation only to show you all related ways. I just revised the affected ways.

Why does the renderer not prefer on of the tags? I think its better to have a wrong track type in ORM than no track.

Thanks and best regards Eckhard

Am Mi., 20. Mai 2020 um 14:12 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen mdeen@xs4all.nl:

On 2020-05-20 13:48, Eckhard M wrote:

...

Hi all,

I am wondering why the railway track 6949 is not shown in ORM:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7905077#map=14/54.1293/12.2472&la...

What Rolf said earlier:

...

-lines with both usage as well as service are not shown: this is a tagging mistake and we force users to correct there things with that

I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have tags service=spur and usage=branch. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008

Maarten

Hi Michael,

that relations will not be rendered is absolutely clear. I only quotes that to collect all the ways that are missing.

But again: Why does the renderer not prefer on of the tags if service and usage are used for the same way? I think its better to have a wrong track type in ORM than no track.

Regards, Eckhard

Am Do., 21. Mai 2020 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb Michael Reichert < osm-ml@michreichert.de>:

Hi,

Am 20/05/2020 um 14.12 schrieb Maarten Deen:

...

I don't think relations are rendered but ways. And the ways have tags service=spur and usage=branch. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672987008

Route relations are not rendered.

Best regards

Michael