Hi Eckhard, Am 21/05/2020 um 09.15 schrieb Eckhard M: > I have seen that railway=owner_change is used not only for real > owner changes but even for district borders etc. From my understanding that > is not meant by the definition of this tag. > > Example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3933432097 > > I mean that the right way is like this: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3583040676 > > Even the the tag railway=border is used in wrong way I think. Is this meant > for federals state borders? No, railway=border is meant for locations where two distinct operators of infrastructure meet at the boundary of two countries (e.g. boundary locations between DB Netz (Germany) and ProRail (The Netherlands)). railway=owner_change is meant for locations where there is no national border (e.g. DB Netz and a private infrastructure operator meeting). > Example: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2437528281 > > What do you all think? I changed a couple of these nodes into railway=site in Germany a few weeks ago because they have a DS100 facility code (railway:ref=*) but I am not against removing them completely because there is no representation on the ground (apart from the boundary stones of the border). Best regards Michael