The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info) contain all catenary structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out that no catenary structures have yet been mapped anywhere in the country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated import. Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be tagged as power=catenary_mast. I'd like to propose an additional power=catenary_fixture tag to tag catenary portal-beams, stanchions and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets). I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring the import a step closer. Thank you in advance.
Jeroen Wegdam Student-assistant at ProRail (Dutch railway asset owner)
PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with proper positions. Before importing the catenaries, I will first finish the railway geometry and platform wall imports. This will result in catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All imports are done manually (with great care for existing data).
Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen notifications@github.com:
This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Hi Jeroen,
I agree. These tags are missing, so in some cases I already marked catenary_mast and "Oberleitungshalteseile" (overhead wire retaining cables ???) for orientation purposes. It helps at mapping from video combined with aerial views.
regards Christian
Am 18.10.2015 um 16:01 schrieb JJJ Wegdam:
The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info) contain all catenary structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out that no catenary structures have yet been mapped anywhere in the country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated import. Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be tagged as power=catenary_mast. *I'd like to propose an additional power=catenary_fixture* *tag *to tag catenary portal-beams, stanchions and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets). I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring the import a step closer. Thank you in advance.
Jeroen Wegdam Student-assistant at ProRail (Dutch railway asset owner)
PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with proper positions. Before importing the catenaries, I will first finish the railway geometry and platform wall imports. This will result in catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All imports are done manually (with great care for existing data).
Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen notifications@github.com:
This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/rurseekatze/OpenRailwayMap/issues/215#issuecomment-149003625.
Openrailwaymap mailing list Openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
/3 words missing...// / Am 20.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Christian Wendel:
Hi Jeroen,
I agree. These tags are missing, so in some cases I already marked catenary_mast and "Oberleitungshalteseile" (overhead wire retaining cables ???) for orientation purposes via way & "note=*". It helps at mapping from video combined with aerial views.
regards Christian
Am 18.10.2015 um 16:01 schrieb JJJ Wegdam:
The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info) contain all catenary structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out that no catenary structures have yet been mapped anywhere in the country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated import. Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be tagged as power=catenary_mast. *I'd like to propose an additional power=catenary_fixture* *tag *to tag catenary portal-beams, stanchions and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets). I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring the import a step closer. Thank you in advance.
Jeroen Wegdam Student-assistant at ProRail (Dutch railway asset owner)
PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with proper positions. Before importing the catenaries, I will first finish the railway geometry and platform wall imports. This will result in catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All imports are done manually (with great care for existing data).
Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen notifications@github.com:
This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/rurseekatze/OpenRailwayMap/issues/215#issuecomment-149003625.
Openrailwaymap mailing list Openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
Openrailwaymap mailing list Openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org
-
Christian Wendel -
JJJ Wegdam