4:01 p.m.
The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info) contain all catenary
structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out that no catenary structures have yet been
mapped anywhere in the country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated
import.
Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be tagged as
power=catenary_mast. I'd like to propose an additional power=catenary_fixture tag to
tag catenary portal-beams, stanchions and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets).
I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring the import a step
closer. Thank you in advance.
Jeroen Wegdam
Student-assistant at ProRail
(Dutch railway asset owner)
PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with proper positions.
Before importing the catenaries, I will first finish the railway geometry and platform
wall imports. This will result in catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All
imports are done manually (with great care for existing data).
Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen
<notifications(a)github.com>:
This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
8:46 p.m.
New subject: [OpenRailwayMap] Proposal to render/tag catenary structures (#215)
Hi Jeroen,
I agree. These tags are missing, so in some cases I already marked
catenary_mast and "Oberleitungshalteseile" (overhead wire retaining
cables ???) for orientation purposes. It helps at mapping from video
combined with aerial views.
regards
Christian
Am 18.10.2015 um 16:01 schrieb JJJ Wegdam:
The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info)
contain all catenary structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out
that no catenary structures have yet been mapped anywhere in the
country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated import.
Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be
tagged as power=catenary_mast. *I'd like to propose an additional
power=catenary_fixture* *tag *to tag catenary portal-beams, stanchions
and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets).
I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring
the import a step closer. Thank you in advance.
Jeroen Wegdam
Student-assistant at ProRail
(Dutch railway asset owner)
PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with
proper positions. Before importing the catenaries, I will first finish
the railway geometry and platform wall imports. This will result in
catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All imports are done
manually (with great care for existing data).
Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen
<notifications(a)github.com>:
> This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
>
<https://github.com/rurseekatze/OpenRailwayMap/issues/215#issuecomment-149...;.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Openrailwaymap mailing list
Openrailwaymap(a)openrailwaymap.org
http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
8:48 p.m.
New subject: [OpenRailwayMap] Proposal to render/tag catenary structures (#215)
/3 words missing...//
/
Am 20.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Christian Wendel:
Hi Jeroen,
I agree. These tags are missing, so in some cases I already marked
catenary_mast and "Oberleitungshalteseile" (overhead wire retaining
cables ???) for orientation purposes via way & "note=*". It helps at
mapping from video combined with aerial views.
regards
Christian
Am 18.10.2015 um 16:01 schrieb JJJ Wegdam:
> The Dutch public datasets (please consider attachment for more info)
> contain all catenary structures in the Netherlands. Since I found out
> that no catenary structures have yet been mapped anywhere in the
> country, I thought it would be a nice opportunity for an automated
> import.
> Catenary poles (displayed as nodes in the datasets) can currently be
> tagged as power=catenary_mast. *I'd like to propose an additional
> power=catenary_fixture* *tag *to tag catenary portal-beams,
> stanchions and arms (displayed as lines in the datasets).
> I'd appreciate to hear your opinion on this new tag. It would bring
> the import a step closer. Thank you in advance.
>
> Jeroen Wegdam
> Student-assistant at ProRail
> (Dutch railway asset owner)
>
> PS/update: currently, I am replacing all Dutch OSM railway ways with
> proper positions. Before importing the catenaries, I will first
> finish the railway geometry and platform wall imports. This will
> result in catenaries that fit seamlesssly to the railways. All
> imports are done manually (with great care for existing data).
>
> Op 18 okt 2015 om 13:09 uur uur schreef Alexander Matheisen
> <notifications(a)github.com>:
>
>> This is a tagging discussion. Please continue it on the mailing list.
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
>>
<https://github.com/rurseekatze/OpenRailwayMap/issues/215#issuecomment-149...;.
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openrailwaymap mailing list
> Openrailwaymap(a)openrailwaymap.org
> http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
_______________________________________________
Openrailwaymap mailing list
Openrailwaymap(a)openrailwaymap.org
http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
3351
days inactive
3353
days old
openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Christian Wendel
-
JJJ Wegdam